Legal Opinion
In re Kelly S.
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided December 1, 1992No. 10979PublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFreedman, J.
This appeal involves coterminous petitions for custody and for termination of parental rights filed by the commissioner of children and youth ser*602vices (commissioner or DCYS). The respondent mother1 appeals from the judgment of the trial court adjudicating Kelly S. to be a neglected and uncared for child under General Statutes § 46b-129 and terminating the respondent’s parental rights pursuant to General Statutes § 45a-717.2 On appeal, the respondent argues that *603the trial court improperly (1) permitted the introduction of certain hearsay evidence, (2) concluded that Kelly S. was neglected and…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- State v. OquendoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- In re Valerie D.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- In re Juvenile Appeal (84-AB)Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
- In re Nicolina T.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1987
- River Dock & Pile, Inc. v. O & G Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- In re Kezia M.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1993
- In re Bruce R.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- In re Felicia D.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1994
- In re Michael D.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2000
- In Re Joseph W., Jr.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2011
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.