Legal Opinion
Calcano v. Calcano
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided July 31, 2001No. SC 16461PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BORDEN, J.
The plaintiff, Rosalia Calcano, appeals1 from the judgment of the trial court, rendered after a jury trial, against the named defendant, Damaris Calcano.2 The plaintiff claims that the trial court improperly admitted into evidence certain office notes and a transcription of the notes prepared by the plaintiff’s chiropractor, Douglas M. Keeney. Specifically, the plaintiff claims that: (1) the office notes and transcription were inadmissible hearsay evidence to which the business records exception; General Statutes § 52-180;3 did not *233apply; (2) the notes and transcription did…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Santopietro v. City of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- State v. GarvinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
- Aspiazu v. OrgeraSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Ramos v. Town of VernonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
- Jefferson Garden Associates v. GreeneSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Grimm v. GrimmSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
- State v. KirschSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- Dinan v. MarchandSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
- Manifold v. RagagliaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
- State v. William C.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.