Legal Opinion
Dorbest Ltd. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
Decided October 31, 2006No. Consol. 05-00003PublishedCited by 81 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
POGUE, Judge.
This matter arises from an affirmative antidumping duty determination by the Depaxtaient of Commerce (“Commerce”) in its investigation of wooden bedroom furniture from the People’s Republic of China (“PRC”). Plaintiffs challenge numerous aspects of that determination here. Before the court are USCIT R. 56.2 Motions for Judgment on the Agency Record filed by the parties, specifically by Dorbest Limited et al (“Dorbest” also known as “Respondents”), the American Furniture Manufacturers Committee for Legal Trade et al. (“AFMC” also the “Petitioners” in the investigation), and…
2Cases cited75 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Martin v. Franklin Capital Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005
70 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by81 opinions
- Zhejiang Dunan Hetian Metal Co., Ltd. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2011
- Fujian Lianfu Forestry Co., Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2009
- Mittal Steel Galati S.A. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2007
- Amanda Foods (Vietnam) Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2009
- Catfish Farmers of America v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2009
76 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.