Legal Opinion
Luoyang Bearing Factory v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
Decided October 1, 2002No. Consol. 99-12-00743PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
TSOUCALAS, Senior Judge.
This consolidated action concerns the claims raised by plaintiff and defendant-intervenor, Luoyang Bearing Factory (“Luoyang”), and defendant-intervenor and plaintiff, The Timken Company (“Timken”), who move pursuant to USCIT R. 56.2 for judgment upon the agency record challenging the Department of Commerce, International Trade Administration’s (“Commerce”) final determination, entitled Final Results of 1997-1998 Anti-dumping Duty Administrative Review and Final Results of New Shipper Review of Tapered Roller Bearings and Parts Thereof, Finished and Unfinished,…
2Cases cited59 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Goldlink Industries Co., Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2006
- Pakfood Public Co. Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2010
- Ta Chen Stainless Steel Pipe, Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2004
- China National MacHinery Import & Export Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2003
- Luoyang Bearing Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2004
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.