Legal Opinion
Goldlink Industries Co., Ltd. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
Decided May 4, 2006No. Consol. 05-00060PublishedCited by 54 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
TSOUCALAS, Senior Judge.
This consolidated action concerns claims raised by Plaintiffs, Goldlink Industries Co., Ltd., Trust Chem Co., Ltd., and Tianjin Hanchem International Trading Co., Ltd. (collectively, “Goldlink”), and Defendant-Intervenors and Plaintiffs, Nation Ford Chemical Company and Sun Chemical Corporation (collectively, “Nation Ford”), and Clariant Corporation (“Clariant”), who move pursuant to USCIT R. 56.2 for judgment upon the agency record challenging the Department of Commerce, International Trade Administration’s (“Commerce’s”) final determination, entitled Notice of…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Consolo v. Federal Maritime CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Nippon Steel Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
- F.lli De Cecco di Filippo Fara S. Martino S.p.A. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2000
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by54 opinions
- Zhejiang Dunan Hetian Metal Co., Ltd. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2011
- Dorbest Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2006
- Downhole Pipe & Equipment, L.P. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2015
- Shandong Huarong MacHinery Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2006
- Fujian Lianfu Forestry Co., Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2009
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.