Foy v. Bremson
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
BOBBITT, Chief Justice.
In her appeal to the Court of Appeals, plaintiff set forth one assignment of error, to wit: “The court erred in its charge on Issue No. 1 as to the Doctrine of Sudden emergency for that it failed to charge that the sudden emergency doctrine would not be available to defendant Bremson if they should find that by his own negligence, he brought about or contributed to the emergency.” (Our italics.)
The Court of Appeals did not discuss this assignment. It awarded a new trial on all issues for error in the court’s instructions relating to burden of proof.
In our opinion, the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Rodgers v. ThompsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
- Rodgers v. CarterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
- Brunson v. GaineySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
- Cockman v. PowersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1958
- Bullock v. . WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Hairston v. Alexander Tank & Equipment Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
- Schaefer v. WicksteadCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988
- GUPTON BY GUPTON v. McCombsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
- Giles v. SmithCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993
- Hairston v. Alexander Tank & Equipment Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.