Legal Opinion

Giles v. Smith

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided November 2, 1993No. 9213DC1064PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WELLS, Judge.

Pursuant to one of her assignments of error, defendant contends that the trial court erred in setting aside the judgment and ordering a new trial. Rule 59 provides in pertinent part:(a) Grounds. — A new trial may be granted to all or any of the parties and on all or part of the issues for any of the following grounds:(8) Error in law occurring at the trial and objected to by the party making the motion.

N.C. Gen. Stat. § 1A-1, Rule 59 of the Rules of Civil Procedure.

The question presented by this assignment of error arose out of these somewhat unusual circumstances. At trial, two…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Ingle v. CassadySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1935
  2. Indiana Lumbermen's Mutual Insurance v. ChampionCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
  3. Jacobs v. LocklearSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
  4. Bolick v. Sunbird Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1989
  5. Foy v. BremsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Moran v. Atha Trucking, Inc.West Virginia Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Sobczak v. VorholtCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007
  3. Pinckney v. BakerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1998
  4. Moran v. Atha Trucking, Inc.West Virginia Supreme Court · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API