Legal Opinion

Cockman v. Powers

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 21, 1958No. 521PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBobbitt, J.

Plaintiff’s testimony is the only evidence as to the cause and circumstances of her injuries. Since the only question is the sufficiency of plaintiff’s evidence to survive defendant’s motion for judgment of nonsuit, a close examination of plaintiff’s testimony is required. Her testimony, summarized in part and quoted in part, is set out below.

Plaintiff lived with her husband, Clarence Cockman, and their 10 and 1-year old sons, some three miles south of Asheboro. She was employed, and had been for some six months, as a sales clerk in an Ashe-boro store; but before this employment she had…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Butner v. SpeaseSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  2. Butner v. . SpeaseSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  3. Ingle v. CassadySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1935
  4. Riddle v. ArtisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
  5. Simmons v. RogersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Rodgers v. ThompsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
  2. Indiana Lumbermen's Mutual Insurance v. ChampionCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
  3. Schloss v. HallmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
  4. Forgy v. SchwartzSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
  5. Day v. DavisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API