Legal Opinion

Hairston v. Alexander Tank & Equipment Co.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided January 18, 1983No. 8226SC55PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HILL, Judge.

Plaintiff’s intestate, John 0. Hairston (hereinafter “Hair-ston”), contracted to purchase a new 1978 Lincoln Continental from defendant Haygood Lincoln Mercury, Inc. (hereinafter “Hay-good”) on Friday, 14 April 1978 and returned to consummate the purchase on Monday, 17 April 1978. Hairston lived in Charlotte, North Carolina; Haygood is in Lowell, North Carolina. Hairston waited at Haygood while the wheels on his Lincoln were changed to conform to the invoice of purchase. One of Haygood’s employees changed the wheels but, in doing so, failed to tighten the lug nuts securing the…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Worthington v. BynumSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  2. Kline v. Moyer and AlbertSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  3. Powers v. S. Sternberg & Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
  4. Summey v. CauthenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
  5. Butner v. SpeaseSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Lovell v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993
  2. Holbrook v. HenleyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1995
  3. Williams v. SmithCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
  4. Lovell v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API