Schaefer v. Wickstead
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
ARNOLD, Judge.
Plaintiff contends that the trial court erred in “failing to submit an issue and charge the jury under the doctrine of last clear chance.” We disagree.
In order to be entitled to an instruction on the doctrine of last clear chance, the plaintiff must prove four elements: that (1) the pedestrian, by his own negligence, placed himself in a position of helpless peril, (2) the defendant was aware of, or by the exercise of reasonable care should have discovered, plaintiffs perilous position and his incapacity to escape, (3) the defendant had the time and means to avoid injury to the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Watson v. WhiteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
- Foy v. BremsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
- GUPTON BY GUPTON v. McCombsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
3Cited by13 opinions
- Williams v. OdellCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988
- Keith v. PolierCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993
- Holbrook v. HenleyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1995
- Sobczak v. VorholtCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007
- Vancamp v. BurgnerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.