Legal Opinion

Foster v. Foster

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 22, 1932No. Docket Nos. 8263, 8264PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DOOLING, J., pro tem.

These two eases were tried together and are here presented on appeal upon one set of briefs. Appellant secured a judgment against defendants Frank W. Foster and Effie L. Foster, his wife, for the foreclosure of a chattel mortgage. The mortgaged property was sold for $422.25, leaving a balance due on the judgment of a little more than $6,000. A deficiency judgment was entered for this balance and to satisfy this judgment appellant caused to be sold at execution a certain ten acres of real estate and over 200,000 shares of the capital stock of Huntington Signal Oil Company…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Lefrooth v. PrenticeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Smitton v. McCulloughCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Tobias v. AdamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  4. Heath v. WilsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
  5. Allee v. ShayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Bradley v. ButchartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Hibernia Savings & Loan Society v. BelcherCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  3. States v. Eleven Certain Parcels of LandDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1942
  4. Overton v. SchmittCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API