Foster v. Foster
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
DOOLING, J., pro tem.
These two eases were tried together and are here presented on appeal upon one set of briefs. Appellant secured a judgment against defendants Frank W. Foster and Effie L. Foster, his wife, for the foreclosure of a chattel mortgage. The mortgaged property was sold for $422.25, leaving a balance due on the judgment of a little more than $6,000. A deficiency judgment was entered for this balance and to satisfy this judgment appellant caused to be sold at execution a certain ten acres of real estate and over 200,000 shares of the capital stock of Huntington Signal Oil Company…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Lefrooth v. PrenticeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
- Smitton v. McCulloughCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
- Tobias v. AdamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
- Heath v. WilsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
- Allee v. ShayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Bradley v. ButchartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
- Hibernia Savings & Loan Society v. BelcherCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
- States v. Eleven Certain Parcels of LandDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1942
- Overton v. SchmittCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936