Legal Opinion

States v. Eleven Certain Parcels of Land

District Court, S.D. California

Decided May 28, 1942No. 36PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

J. F. T. O’CONNOR, District Judge.

The question to be determined is whether Joseph Victor Kuznik or R. E. Titus is entitled to the sum of $646.18, which sum represents the proceeds of condemnation award for a one-sixth interest in parcel No. 3 described in the complaint, said sum at the present time being held in the Registry of the above entitled court.

On May 15, 1930, C. A. Spreckels conveyed the interest in the real property in question to his daughter, Lurline Kuznik. On July 13, 1937, R. E. Titus purchased at execution sale notes and other evidences of indebtedness of C. A. Spreckels to…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Hedden v. WaldeckCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Bradley v. ButchartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Priest v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Hibernia Savings & Loan Society v. BelcherCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Roberts v. BurrCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Wyzard v. GollerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
  2. Commons v. SchineCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
  3. In Re DeReusUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. California · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API