Overton v. Schmitt
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
Appeal by defendant Amy I. Schmitt from judgment for plaintiffs.
This action was brought by plaintiffs to quiet their title to an 828-acre tract of land in Stanislaus County known as the “Hatmark Ranch”, conveyed to them by deed of Mark and Hattie 0. Page dated July 8, 1931, recorded November 12, 1932. Defendant Amy I. Schmitt, who is the sole appellant and claimant to ownership of said property, filed herein an answer and also a cross-complaint alleging that title had vested in her by virtue of a sheriff’s deed dated February 6, 1934; that said conveyance to plaintiffs by the Pages…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Morrow v. GravesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- Commercial National Bank v. RobertsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
- Finnie v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
- Asadoorian v. KludjianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
- Foster v. FosterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
3Cited by1 opinion
- MTC Financial Inc. v. Cal. Dept. of Tax and Fee Admin.California Court of Appeal · 2019