Legal Opinion

Commerce & Industry Insurance v. City of Toledo

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided August 23, 1989No. 88-577PublishedCited by 129 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtH. Brown, J.

This case presents two questions. The first is whether Columbia Gas is entitled to summary judgment. The second is whether Toledo is protected from liability by either the public duty rule or former R.C. 701.02(B). We answer the first query in the affirmative and in response to the second query we find that Toledo was partially but not totally protected by the public duty rule.

I

Appellees claim that Columbia Gas was negligent in (1) failing to investigate whether shutting off gas service would jeopardize the fire protection system, (2) failing to warn representatives of the fire department or…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Temple v. Wean United, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Menifee v. Ohio Welding Products, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1984
  3. O'Brien v. University Community Tenants Union, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Strother v. HutchinsonOhio Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Delman v. City of Cleveland HeightsOhio Supreme Court · 1989

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by129 opinions

  1. Ileto v. Glock Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  2. Simmers v. Bentley Construction Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Wallace v. Ohio Dept. of CommerceOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Cromer v. Children's Hosp. Med. Ctr. of Akron (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2015
  5. State v. WilliamsOhio Supreme Court · 1997

124 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API