State v. Williams
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtAlice Robie Resnick, J.
Initially, we note that appellant, the state of Ohio, did not appeal the issue of appellee’s right to counsel at trial. Thus, the sole issue before this court is whether there is sufficient evidence to prove that Liggins and Williams were “family or household members,” as is required in order to convict appellee of a violation of R.C. 2919.25.
R.C. 2919.25 states:
“(A) No person shall knowingly cause or attempt to cause physical harm to a family or household member.
“(B) No person shall recklessly cause serious physical harm to a family or household member.
“(C) No person, by threat of force,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Commerce & Industry Insurance v. City of ToledoOhio Supreme Court · 1989
- Felton v. FeltonOhio Supreme Court · 1997
- O'KANE v. IrvineCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
- Desiato v. AbbottNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1992
- Caldwell v. CoppolaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by89 opinions
- State v. WoullardOhio Court of Appeals · 2004
- State v. CarswellOhio Supreme Court · 2007
- Williams v. OrmsbyOhio Supreme Court · 2012
- State v. McGlothanOhio Supreme Court · 2014
- State v. OsimantiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
84 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.