San Jose Improvement Co. v. Auzerais
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Santa Clara County and from an order refusing a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, J.
The mayor and common council of the city of San Jose passed a resolution May 18, 1891, declaring its intention to order the improvement of a portion of El Dorado street, “said improvement to consist of the construction therein of granite or artificial stone curbing on both sides thereof to the official curb grade, excepting therefrom any laid upon the grade; also excavating the roadway of said street to a suitable subgrade, and improving the same as follows [Giving *499a description of pavement to be laid upon the street] ”: The city council having afterward ordered that the work described in the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Bolton v. GilleranCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
3Cited by11 opinions
- Shapard v. City of MissoulaMontana Supreme Court · 1914
- Fay v. ReedCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
- Schwiesau v. MahonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
- Burnham v. AbrahamsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1913
- Pacific Paving Co. v. VersoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1910
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.