Legal Opinion

Seidel v. Lee

District Court, D. Delaware

Decided December 30, 1996No. Civil Action 93-494-JJFPublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FARNAN, Chief Judge.

Presently before the Court are two related motions in this action for violation of the Investment Company Act of 1940 (“ICA”), breach of contract, breach of fiduciary duty, and fraud. After a brief overview of the factual background, the Court will address the Motion To Strike Or Dismiss The Second Amended Class Action Complaint pursuant to Rule 12(f) and Rule 12(b)(6) filed by all the Defendants in this action. (D.I. 77, 78). Then, the Court will address the Motion To Dismiss The Second Amended Class Action Complaint (“SAC”) filed by the Merrill Lynch and…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Ernst & Ernst v. HochfelderSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Central Bank of Denver, N. A. v. First Interstate Bank of Denver, N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994
  4. Lampf, Pleva, Lipkind, Prupis & Petigrow v. GilbertsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. Burks v. LaskerSupreme Court of the United States · 1979

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. End of the Road Trust Ex Rel. Fruehauf Trailer Corp. v. Terex Corp. (In Re Fruehauf Trailer Corp.)District Court, D. Delaware · 2000
  2. Resource Ventures, Inc. v. Resources Management International, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1999
  3. Symbol Technologies, Inc. v. Aruba Networks, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2009
  4. Aoki v. Benihana Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2012
  5. Fesnak & Associates, LLP v. U.S. Bank National Ass'nDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2010

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API