Legal Opinion

Burks v. Lasker

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided May 14, 1979No. 77-1724PublishedCited by 430 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Brennan

The question presented in this case is whether the disinterested directors of an investment company may terminate a stockholders’ derivative suit brought against other directors under the Investment Company and Investment Advisers Acts of 1940, 15 U. S. C. § 80a-1 et seq.; 15 U. S. C. § 80b-1 et seq. To decide that question, we must determine the appropriate roles of federal and state law in such a controversy.

Respondents, shareholders of Fundamental Investors, Inc., an investment company registered under the Investment Company Act, brought this derivative suit in February 1973 in the…

2Cases cited43 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Mt. Healthy City School District Board of Education v. DoyleSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Bell v. HoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  4. Butner v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. Cort v. AshSupreme Court of the United States · 1975

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by430 opinions

  1. Carlson v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Transamerica Mortgage Advisors, Inc. v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Kamen v. Kemper Financial Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Trudeau v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2006
  5. United States v. BestfoodsSupreme Court of the United States · 1998

425 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API