Legal Opinion
Lampf, Pleva, Lipkind, Prupis & Petigrow v. Gilbertson
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided September 13, 1991No. 90-333PublishedCited by 1,169 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Blackmun
In this litigation we must determine which statute of limitations is applicable to a private suit brought pursuant to § 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, 48 Stat. 891, 15 U. S. C. § 78j(b), and to Securities and Exchange Commission Rule 10b-5, 17 CFR §240.10b-5 (1990), promulgated thereunder.
I
The controversy arises from the sale of seven Connecticut limited partnerships formed for the purpose of purchasing and leasing computer hardware and software. Petitioner Lampf, Pleva, Lipldnd, Prupis & Petigrow is a West Orange, N. J., law firm that aided in organizing the partnerships and…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Wilson v. GarciaSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Ernst & Ernst v. HochfelderSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Irwin v. Department of Veterans AffairsSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- DelCostello v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Blue Chip Stamps v. Manor Drug StoresSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1,169 opinions
- Alexander v. SandovalSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- ATSI Communications, Inc. v. Shaar Fund, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007
- Central Bank of Denver, N. A. v. First Interstate Bank of Denver, N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Gebser v. Lago Vista Independent School DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Gustafson v. Alloyd Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1995
1,164 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.