Legal Opinion

Aoki v. Benihana Inc.

District Court, D. Delaware

Decided March 15, 2012No. Civ. No. 11-489-SLRPublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

SUE L. ROBINSON, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

On June 2, 2011, Keiko Ono Aoki (“Aoki”) and Benihana of Tokyo, Inc. (“BOT,” collectively “plaintiffs”) filed a complaint (D.I. 1) against Benihana, Inc. (“BI” or “defendant”) for defamation and injurious falsehood. On June 24, 2011, defendant filed a motion to dismiss (“original motion”) (D.I. 6) pursuant to Federal *762Rule of Civil Procedure (“Rule”) 12(b)(6). On July 11, 2011, plaintiffs filed an amended complaint (“amended complaint”) (D.I. 9) as well as an answering brief (D.I. 10) to the original motion. In its reply brief to…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. Tellabs, Inc. v. Makor Issues & Rights, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
  5. Christopher v. HarburySupreme Court of the United States · 2002

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Cortina v. Goya Foods, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 2015
  2. 10x Genomics, Inc. v. Celsee, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2019
  3. Allergan USA, Inc. v. Prollenium US Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2019
  4. Avenatti v. Fox News Network, LLCDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2021
  5. Bench Walk Lighting LLC v. Everlight Electronics CO., LTD.District Court, D. Delaware · 2020

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API