Legal Opinion
Fesnak & Associates, LLP v. U.S. Bank National Ass'n
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided July 9, 2010No. C.A. 09-680-JJFPublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
FARNAN, District Judge.
Presently before the Court are the following Motions filed by Plaintiff Fesnak and Associates, LLP: (1) Motion To Strike The Third, Eighth and Ninth Affirmative Defenses Asserted In Defendant Citibank, N.A.’s Answer (D.I. 14); (2) Motion For Summary Judgment On Count II (D.I. 17); and (3) Motion For Protective Order And To Stay All Discovery Pending Disposition Of Its Motion For Summary Judgment (D.I. 39). For the reasons discussed, the Motion To Strike will be granted in part and denied in part, the Motion For Summary Judgment will be denied, and the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Cipollone v. Liggett Group, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Rhone-Poulenc Basic Chemicals Co. v. American Motorists Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1992
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Senju Pharmaceutical Co. v. Apotex, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2013
- Xpertuniverse, Inc. v. Cisco Systems Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2012
- Pennington v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2013
- Juniper Networks, Inc. v. Palo Alto Networks, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2012
- Shults & Tamm v. Tobey (In re Hawaiian Telcom Communications, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Hawaii · 2012
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.