Legal Opinion

State v. Martin

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided December 4, 1984No. TC M176267; CA A25726; SC S30304PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, J.

The defendant was charged with and convicted of failure to perform the duties of a driver involved in an accident, ORS 483.602. In his appeal to the Court of Appeals one of his assignments of error was that the trial judge denied his motion for acquittal. The Court of Appeals affirmed without opinion. State v. Martin, 65 Or App 814, 671 P2d 1211 (1983). We granted review primarily to evaluate the statute involved in this case. We reverse and remand to the trial court for entry of judgment of acquittal.

On December 3,1981, at about 6:45 a.m., defendant, a parking lot attendant at a downtown…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Lane County v. R. A. Heintz Construction Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Monaco v. United States Fidelity and Guaranty Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1976
  3. State v. EastmanOregon Supreme Court · 1981
  4. State v. ReynoldsOregon Supreme Court · 1961
  5. Union Pacific Railroad v. AndersonOregon Supreme Court · 1941

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. HvalCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
  2. State v. Garcia-CisnerosCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017
  3. State v. LaytonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2025
  4. Ransom v. Radiology Specialists of the Nw.Oregon Supreme Court · 2018
  5. State v. LaytonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API