Legal Opinion

State v. Eastman

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided December 9, 1981No. TC 10-79-08891, CA 18018; TC 79-30062, CA 17710; SC 27826PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*187TANZER, J.

The issue presented by these two consolidated cases is whether a defendant convicted of leaving the scene of an accident without performing statutory duties may be sentenced to pay restitution for damages resulting from the accident. We granted the state’s petition for review in this case, along with petitions in State v. Dillon, 292 Or 172, 637 P2d 602 (1981) and State v. Tuma, 292 Or 194, 637 P2d 614 (1981), in order to clarify the circumstances in which a sentence of restitution is authorized.

Defendant Eastman’s car collided with a motorcycle at an intersection. Two people riding…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. DillonOregon Supreme Court · 1981
  2. State v. TumaOregon Supreme Court · 1981

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. State v. DillonOregon Supreme Court · 1981
  2. People v. MartinezCalifornia Supreme Court · 2017
  3. State v. HvalCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
  4. State v. StarkeySupreme Court of Iowa · 1989
  5. State v. WhitneyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1985

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API