Ransom v. Radiology Specialists of the Nw.
Oregon Supreme Court
1Concurrence
LANDAU, S. J., concurring.
I agree with the majority that there is no basis for the trial court's decision to limit the questioning of the radiologists. Nothing in the text of ORCP 36 supports it; in fact, the text of the rule requires the contrary result. Nor does Stevens v. Czerniak , 336 Or. 392, 84 P.3d 140 (2004), compel such a limit on deposition questioning.
I write separately to raise the question whether Stevens was correctly decided in the first place. With heartfelt respect for my colleagues who decided that case, I don't understand how it squares with basic principles of statutory…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State v. GainesOregon Supreme Court · 2009
- Stevens v. CzerniakOregon Supreme Court · 2004
- Monaco v. United States Fidelity and Guaranty Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1976
- Wyers v. American Medical Response Northwest, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 2016
- Bauder v. Farmers InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1986
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.