Legal Opinion

State v. Hval

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided May 9, 2001No. Z448855; A101650PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLinder, J.

Defendant appeals from a judgment of conviction for failure to perform the duties of a driver when property is damaged, an offense commonly termed “hit and run.” ORS 811.700(l)(a). He assigns error to the trial court’s denial of his motion for judgment of acquittal and to the court’s order under ORS 811.706 requiring him to pay $500 compensation to the victim as a condition of probation. We affirm.

The relevant facts are not disputed. Janell Suell was driving her car through a Portland intersection when it was struck on the left side by a car driven by defendant. Defendant got out of his car…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Honda Motor Co. v. ObergSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  3. State v. DillonOregon Supreme Court · 1981
  4. State v. StalheimOregon Supreme Court · 1976
  5. State v. MooreOregon Supreme Court · 1996

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. State v. AlgeoOregon Supreme Court · 2013
  2. State v. Ignacio GutierrezCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
  3. State v. Randell BlakeSupreme Court of Vermont · 2017
  4. State v. GillNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
  5. State v. ShaferIdaho Court of Appeals · 2007

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API