Legal Opinion

Monaco v. United States Fidelity and Guaranty Co.

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided June 4, 1976PublishedCited by 53 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McAllister, j.

The plaintiff, Teresa Monaco, through her guardian ad litem, Caroline A. Monaco, brought this action against the defendant seeking recovery under the uninsured motorist coverage provisions of a policy issued by the defendant.

The plaintiff sustained personal injuries in a collision on January 24, 1974 while a passenger in a motor vehicle. The plaintiff’s damages were stipulated to be in excess of $20,000. Neither the driver of the vehicle nor the vehicle itself was insured at the time of the accident.

Defendant had issued an automobile insurance policy to Caroline A. Monaco,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Glidden v. Farmers Automobile InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Lane County v. R. A. Heintz Construction Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Peterson v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1964
  4. Bacchus v. Farmers Insurance Group ExchangeArizona Supreme Court · 1970
  5. American Motorists Insurance Co. v. ThompsonOregon Supreme Court · 1969

3Cited by53 opinions

  1. State v. StamperCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
  2. Newton v. Nationwide Mutual Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Colorado · 1979
  3. Deluxe Cabinet Works v. MessmerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
  4. Godfrey v. Fred Meyer StoresCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
  5. McLaughlin v. WilsonOregon Supreme Court · 2019

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API