Legal Opinion

Romah v. Romah

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 17, 1991No. 606PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CIRILLO, Judge:

This is an appeal from a final order of the Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County sustaining preliminary objections in the nature of a demurrer, and dismissing plaintiff’s complaint. We affirm.

Joseph L. Romah (“Joseph”) and Nicholas Romah (“Nicholas”) entered into a mortgage agreement in which Joseph was mortgagor and Nicholas was mortgagee. Joseph defaulted on the mortgage and on April 2, 1987, a confession of judgment was entered in favor of Nicholas. 1 The judg ment entered was for the principal amount of $62,000.00, interest of $611.51, and an attorney’s fee of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Duquesne Light Co. v. Pittsburgh Railways Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  2. Riverside Memorial Mausoleum, Inc. v. Umet TrustCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1978
  3. Foulke v. Hatfield Fair Grounds Bazaar, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
  4. Nevling v. Commercial Credit Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
  5. Beckett v. LauxSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Hopewell Estates, Inc. v. KentSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  2. Zhang v. Southeastern Financial Group, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1997
  3. Newton v. First Union National BankDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2004
  4. Magee v. JG Wentworth & Company, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  5. Stivala Investments, Inc. v. Atlantic National Trust LLC (Stivala Investments, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2008

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API