Legal Opinion

Nevling v. Commercial Credit Co.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 19, 1944No. Appeal, 71PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Reno, J.,

Appellant instituted assumpsit to recover for the breach of obligations allegedly assumed by defendant when it became the assignee of a bailment lease. The appeal is from the judgment n. o. v. entered for defendant after a verdict had been directed in appellant’s favor.

I. V. Wolfe, trading as Drey Street Motor Company, as lessor, entered into a bailment lease agreement with appellant, as lessee, of a used 'Chrysler automobile on July 11, 1930. The lease was a standard printed instrument issued by defendant finance company and included a judgment note in negotiable form,…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Wallace's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  2. Pasquinelli v. Southern Macaroni Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
  3. Siegfried v. BoydSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1912
  4. Ruth-Hastings Glass Tube Co. v. SlatterySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
  5. McBride v. Western Pennsylvania Paper Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1919

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Hopewell Estates, Inc. v. KentSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  2. Reiter v. ReiterSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
  3. Iorfida v. Mary Robert Realty Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  4. Rearick v. Elderton State BankSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  5. Riverside Memorial Mausoleum, Inc. v. Umet TrustCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1978

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API