Legal Opinion

Duquesne Light Co. v. Pittsburgh Railways Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 9, 1963No. Appeals, Nos. 26 and 27PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr: Justice Cohen,

No. 26 and No. 27 are appeals' from the denial of two separate, petitions to open judgment.

On. June. 5, 19.33,. appellant Pittsburgh Railways Company (Railways) and appellee; Duquesne Light Company (Duquesne) entered into an agreement for the lease to- Railways of' certain substations and equip.ment necessary to convert electric power supplied by Duquesne. At that time, Railways and Duquesne were affiliated companies. The lease which was terminable upon 60-days’ notice provided for an annual rent of $220,600A3.1

*3Pursuant to ¡a warrant ¡of attorney 'contained in the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Jones v. CostlowSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
  2. Federal Land Bank of Baltimore v. PutnamSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
  3. Norristown Ford Co. v. Metropolitan Auto Dealer, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1957

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Gregory v. ChehiCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988
  2. unempl.ins.rep. Cch 22,077 Harry T. Edmundson v. Borough of Kennett Square Robert F. Goddu Kenneth Roberts Herbert L. Waltz Albert J. McCarthyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
  3. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. BrownDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1966
  4. Carr v. RoseDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1997
  5. E-Z Parks, Inc. v. Philadelphia Parking AuthorityCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1987

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API