Foulke v. Hatfield Fair Grounds Bazaar, Inc.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Weight, J.,
This case arises as the result of a rule, granted upon petition of a mortgagor, to show cause why an execution issued upon a judgment entered on a mortgage bond should not be satisfied of record without the payment of any or all of the sum of $3,691.41, representing an attorney’s commission of five percent for collection. The court below discharged the rule, and this appeal by the mortgagor followed.
On May 26, 1959, the Hatfield Fair Grounds Bazaar, Inc., hereinafter referred to as Hatfield, purchased from Kirk Foulke and his wife, Kathryn R. Foulke, a farm premises…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Harper v. Consolidated Rubber Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
- Daly v. MaitlandSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1879
- Huling v. DrexellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1838
- Warwick Iron Co. v. MortonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1892
- McAllister's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1868
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Federal Land Bank of Baltimore v. FetnerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
- Eastgate Enterprises, Inc. v. Bank & Trust Co. of Old York RoadSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Budagher v. Sunnyland Enterprises, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1977
- Warden v. ZanellaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
- Alcoa Edgewater No. 1 Fed. Credit Union v. CarrollSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1965
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.