Legal Opinion

Hopewell Estates, Inc. v. Kent

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided August 22, 1994No. 3703PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WIEAND, Judge:

The issue in this appeal is whether an action for professional negligence against a surveyor and an engineer is barred by a prior judicial denial of a motion to open a judgment confessed on a note given in payment of their professional fees. The trial court held that the action for negligence was barred and entered summary judgment in favor of’ the surveyor and the engineer. The claimant appealed. We reverse and remand for further proceedings.

In August, 1989, Hopewell Estates purchased a tract of land in Union Township, Berks County, intending to place thereon a housing…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Marks v. TasmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  2. Stevenson v. SilvermanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
  3. Stidham v. Millvale Sportsmen's ClubSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  4. Hochman v. Mortgage Finance Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  5. Thompson v. Karastan Rug MillsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1974

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Donald Urrutia v. Harrisburg County Police Dept. Sean McCormack Asst. D.A. Denis Thomason, Donald UrrutiaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1996
  2. Harber Philadelphia Center City Office Ltd. v. LPCI Ltd. PartnershipSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  3. Mariner Chestnut Partners, L.P. Ex Rel. Lamm v. LenfestSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
  4. Dempsey v. Cessna Aircraft Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  5. Carr v. RoseDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1997

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API