Legal Opinion

Jeffers v. Easton, Eldridge & Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided July 17, 1896No. S. F. No. 174PublishedCited by 36 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco and from an order denying a new trial. Charles W. Slack, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtMcFarland, J.

This is an action brought by the plaintiffs, Jeffers & Wright, to recover certain moneys alleged to be due upon an assignment by them of a certain leasehold interest to the defendant Easton, Eldridge & Co., a corporation. Certain individual defendants are also sued. Judgment went for defendants, and plaintiffs appeal from the judgment and from an order denying a new trial.

In 1886 one George Hyde executed to the plaintiffs, Jeffers & Wright, a written lease of certain real property in the city of San Francisco, for a term of eight years and six months, at a monthly rental of $175. Plaintiffs…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. The Mayor, C., of New-York v. . MabieNew York Court of Appeals · 1855
  2. King v. RichardsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1841
  3. Palmtag v. DoutrickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
  4. Frisbee v. HoffnagleNew York Supreme Court · 1814
  5. Smiley v. Van WinkleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1856

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Callahan v. MartinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Dabney v. EdwardsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  3. J. S. Potts Drug Co. v. BenedictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
  4. German-American Sav. Bank v. GollmerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
  5. Summerville v. Stockton Milling Co.California Supreme Court · 1904

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API