Legal Opinion

Beaudry v. Peterson

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 16, 1942No. Civ. 6665PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DEIRUP, J. pro tem.

Plaintiff sued upon a common count to recover the sum of $4,000 and interest. The trial court found in his favor and judgment was entered as prayed. Thereafter the court made an order granting a new trial, from which this appeal has been taken.

The findings of fact disclose that the plaintiff and the defendant M. R. Peterson (doing business under the name of Giant King Mining Company), who is the sole defendant in the action, entered into an agreement on October 11, 1939, for the sale and purchase of personal property. The agreement, omitting the description of the property,…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. J. S. Potts Drug Co. v. BenedictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Johnson v. KaeserCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Secreto v. CarlanderCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
  4. Drummond v. DrummondCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
  5. Lucerne Country Club v. BealCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Bowden v. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Grover v. TindallCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
  3. Construction MacHinery Co. v. Willard & Rodman, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1962
  4. In re United States ExpressDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1966
  5. Lunny v. LabrucherieCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API