Legal Opinion

Sartori v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided November 4, 2003No. 98-553LPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

MILLER, Judge.

This case is before the court on defendant’s motion to dismiss Counts II and IV of plaintiffs’ complaint for failure to state a claim, RCFC 12(b)(6), and Count III for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, RCFC 12(b)(1). Plaintiffs own a tract of land that the Government determined to be a wetland subject to federal control. The cognizant federal agencies ordered plaintiffs to cease activities on the land, which plaintiffs claim constituted an inverse condemnation, a breach of contract, a deprivation of substantive due process, and an action barred by equitable estoppel. The…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
  4. Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Doe v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
  2. Riviera Drilling & Exploration Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004
  3. Evideo Owners v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
  4. Pure Power!, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
  5. Sartori v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API