Legal Opinion
Pure Power!, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided February 10, 2006No. 05-559CPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
CHRISTINE O.C. MILLER, Judge.
This case is before the court on defendant’s motion to dismiss. Argument is deemed unnecessary. The issues for decision are (1) whether the United States Court of Federal Claims lacks subject matter jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1491(a)(1) (2000), where plaintiff fails to plead the existence of an express or implied-in-fact contract; and (2) whether plaintiff has standing as an “interested party” under 28 U.S.C. § 1491(b)(1) (2000), where a prospective subcontractor does not challenge or base its rights on an actual solicitation.…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Lujan v. National Wildlife FederationSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Ascom Hasler Mailing Systems, Inc. v. United States Postal ServiceDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Mobile Medical International Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
- Chant Engineering Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007