Legal Opinion

Akin v. Baldwin Piano Co.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 31, 1916No. 7827PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Error from District Court, Blaine County ; Will Linn, Assigned Judge. Action by the Baldwin Piano Company against Lee Akin, Sheriff. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

JOHNSON, C.

Upon June 1, 1913, the Baldwin Piano Company and one Shaw entered into a written contract, in the form of a letter signed by Shaw and accepted by the piano company, by the terms of which Shaw was to engage in the business of the retail sale of th'e pianos of the company. Upon June 22, 1914, Shaw placed with the piano company a written order for 14 pianos, upon the face of which order it was provided that the order was to be subject to the conditions noted on the reverse side thereof; and upon the reverse side of the order was printed the said agreement of June 1, 1913,.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Moore v. First Nat. Bank of Iowa CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  2. Bank of Commerce of Ralston v. GaskillSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
  3. Van Arsdale v. PeacockSupreme Court of Kansas · 1913
  4. Barteldes Seed Co. v. Border Queen Mill & Elevator Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
  5. McKinney v. GrantSupreme Court of Kansas · 1907

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Charles M. Stieff, Inc. v. City of San AntonioTexas Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Ahrens Refrigerator Co. v. R. H. Williams Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
  3. General Electric Co. v. MartinWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1925
  4. Armstrong Music Co. v. BoysenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
  5. Sticelber & Mong v. HaddockSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API