Legal Opinion

Van Arsdale v. Peacock

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided July 5, 1913No. 18,327PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal from Stafford district court.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Benson, J.:

The question in this appeal is whether the plaintiff as mortgagee, or the piano company, has the right to the possession of a piano upon the follow*348ing facts: A. E. DeMars, a piano dealer of Wichita, sent the following order, dated April 15, 1911, to the company:

“Ship to A. E. DeMars.

Place, Wichita, Kans.

How ship, Santa Fe. When, at once.

The terms, Net cash, 30 days with 1% per cent per month thereafter.

This order is subject to the conditions as noted on the reverse side of this sheet. This order is subject to the approval and acceptance of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. McKinney v. GrantSupreme Court of Kansas · 1907

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Charles M. Stieff, Inc. v. City of San AntonioTexas Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Ellet-Kendall Shoe Co. v. MartinCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1915
  3. Hansen v. Transamerica InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Akin v. Baldwin Piano Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  5. Darling & Co. v. PetriSupreme Court of Kansas · 1933

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API