Legal Opinion

Moore v. First Nat. Bank of Iowa City

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided January 9, 1912No. 1175PublishedCited by 46 opinions

Error from Bryan County Court; Chas. A. Phillips, Judge. Action by the First National Bank of Iowa City against A. W. Moore. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion! by

SHARP, C.

The defendant in error, plaintiff below, is hereinafter referred to as plaintiff; the plaintiff in error, defendant below, as defendant; and the Rhode Island Manufacturing Company, as the Rhode Island Company.

It was not necessary to allege or prove that the several bills of exchange were protested for nonpayment. These bills of exchange were drawn on and accepted by the defendant, who, if bound at all, was primarily liable; hence no notice of presentation and dishonor was necessary. Daniel on Negotiable Instruments, art. 995; 7 Cyc. 1053. The maker or acceptor of bills of…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Elwood v. . the Western Union Telegraph Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1871
  2. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western Railroad v. ConverseSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  3. Pullman Palace Car Co. v. LaackIllinois Supreme Court · 1892
  4. Canajoharie National Bank v. DiefendorfNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
  5. Phoenix Ins. Co. v. DosterSupreme Court of the United States · 1882

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by46 opinions

  1. Flesher v. CallahanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  2. McPherrin v. TittleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  3. Jones v. Citizens' State BankSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  4. Continental Ins. Co. v. ChanceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  5. Littlejohn v. Midland Valley R. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API