Legal Opinion

Charles M. Stieff, Inc. v. City of San Antonio

Texas Supreme Court

Decided January 5, 1938No. 6967PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Presiding Judge Smedley

delivered the opinion of th Commission of Appeals, Section B.

The Court of Civil Appeals, with Chief Justice Bickett dissenting, reversed a judgment of the district court in favor of plaintiff in error against defendant in error for $1,595.75 and rendered judgment that plaintiff in error take nothing. 83 S. W. (2d) 357. It is our opinion, after reading the statement of facts and the transcript and carefully examining the authorities cited in the majority opinion, the dissenting opinion and the briefs of the parties, that the conclusions of Chief Justice Bickett, as…

2Cases cited46 opinions

  1. Sturm v. BokerSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  2. Butler Bros. Shoe Co. v. United States Rubber Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1907
  3. Ludvigh v. American Woolen Co. of NYSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  4. Warner v. MartinSupreme Court of the United States · 1851
  5. In re Columbus Buggy Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1906

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Franklin v. Jackson, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)1993
  2. Gaudern v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1981
  3. Garrett v. International Milling Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1949
  4. Employers Casualty Co. v. PetersonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1980
  5. Johnson v. RobinsonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1953

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API