Barteldes Seed Co. v. Border Queen Mill & Elevator Co.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from Prolate Court, Kay County; R. L. Howsley, Judge. Action by the Barteldes Seed Company against the Border Queen Mill & Elevator Company and others. Judgment for defendants, and plaintiff brings error.
Read the full summary
Error from Prolate Court, Kay County; R. L. Howsley, Judge. Action by the Barteldes Seed Company against the Border Queen Mill & Elevator Company and others. Judgment for defendants, and plaintiff brings error. On the 9th day of February, 1907, the plaintiff in error, the Barteldes Seed Company, as plaintiff, instituted its action against the defendant in error, A- F. Harness, as defendant, in the probate court of Kay county, Okla., alleging that said defendant was indebted to said plaintiff in the sum of $12-9.27 for goods, wares, and merchandise, etc., sold and delivered by plaintiff to…
1Opinion of the CourtWilliams, J.
(after stating the facts as above). The only questions raised on the record in this case are: (1) Whether or not the contract hereinafter referred to creates an agency between the principal, the Border Queen Mill & Elevator Company, and its codefendant in error, A. F. Harness, as agent; and (2) whether or not said contract is void on its face as being in restraint of trade, and in violation of the statutes of the United States relating to trusts and unlawful combinations.
1. Said contract expressly provides that the said A. F. Harness, under said contract, is the lawful agent of the said…
2Cited by8 opinions
- Wynne v. McCarthyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1938
- Winn v. WillmottSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
- Horn Et Ux. v. GibsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
- Akin v. Baldwin Piano Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- Ahrens Refrigerator Co. v. R. H. Williams Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.