Legal Opinion
Sticelber & Mong v. Haddock
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided May 22, 1923No. 11307PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
JARMAN, C.
This is the second appeal of this case. The defendant in the case of Haddock v. Sticelber & Mong, 65 Okla. 254, 165 Pac. 1138, appealed from a judgment based upon an instructed verdict for the plaintiffs, which judgment was reversed by this court, and remanded for a new trial. A new trial was had, and the plaintiffs have now appealed from the judgment of the lower court based upon an instructed verdict for the defendant.
The plaintiffs bring this action to recover the sum of $1,118 for drilling an oil and gas well for the defendant. The defendant alleges that he was to pay…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Moore v. First Nat. Bank of Iowa CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
- Littlejohn v. Midland Valley R. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- Frick-Reid Supply Co. v. HunterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- Abbott v. DingusSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
- Haddock v. Sticelber MongSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Stewart v. ColvinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1949
- Buckles v. SmithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1945