Legal Opinion

Carrillo v. SAIF

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided March 17, 2021No. A169786PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

8 Argued and submitted November 9, 2020, reversed and remanded March 17, 2021 In the Matter of the Compensation of Mario Carrillo, Claimant. Mario CARRILLO, Petitioner, v. SAIF CORPORATION and Medford School District 549C, Respondents. Workers’ Compensation Board 1303729; A169786

484 P3d 398

Claimant seeks judicial review of an order of the Workers’ Compensation Board on remand adhering to its conclusions that claimant’s left shoulder con- dition was a combined condition as a combination of a preexisting condition and symptoms of the preexisting condition and that SAIF had met its burden under…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Brown v. SAIF Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 2017
  2. Brown v. SAIF Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
  3. Multifoods Specialty Distribution v. McAteeOregon Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Multifoods Specialty Distribution v. McAteeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
  5. Arms v. SAIF Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2015

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Pedro v. SAIFCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2021
  2. Beamon v. SAIFCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2026
  3. Interiano v. SAIFCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2021
  4. Beamon v. SAIFCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2026
  5. Gibson v. ESISCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API