Legal Opinion

Multifoods Specialty Distribution v. McAtee

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided April 11, 2002No. WCB 97-09143; CA A101980; SC S47519PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDe Muniz, J.

In this workers’ compensation case, employer Multifoods Specialty Distribution accepted claimant McAtee’s injury as a “lumbar strain (combined condition).” The term “combined condition” referred to earlier compensable injuries and a resulting degenerative condition that existed simultaneously with the lumbar strain. Subsequently, employer denied the claim based on information that the lumbar strain was no longer the major contributing cause of claimant’s discomfort and need for treatment. An administrative law judge (AU) determined that employer permissibly had denied the claim. The Workers’…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Multifoods Specialty Distribution v. McAteeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
  3. Wilson v. State Farm InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1998

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Brown v. SAIF Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 2017
  2. Brown v. SAIF Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
  3. Coleman v. Oregon Parks & Recreation DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
  4. Liberty v. StateCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
  5. Petock v. AsanteOregon Supreme Court · 2011

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API