Legal Opinion

Still v. Industrial Commission

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided June 29, 1976No. 1 CA-IC 1357PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

NELSON, Judge.

Heard Still (Still) was injured while employed as a laborer for D & M Masonry Company (D & M). He filed a claim for workmen’s compensation which was accepted by the Fidelity & Casualty Company of New York, the workmen’s compensation carrier for D & M. After extensive medical treatment Still was eventually awarded a 25% disabliity to his right leg, a scheduled award for partial permanent disability. This determination by the insurance carrier, as well as Still’s average monthly wage, was litigated before the Industrial Commission of Arizona. The hearing officer agreed with…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Inland Steel Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1949
  2. Matlock v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Trujillo v. TanuzNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1973
  4. Hite v. Evart Products Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1971
  5. Powell v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1969

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Antillon v. New Mexico State Highway DepartmentNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1991
  2. Ragland v. Morrison-Knudsen Co., Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Scott v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1978
  4. Tabor v. Levi Strauss & Co.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 1990
  5. Davis v. Industrial Com'n of ArizonaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1982

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API