Legal Opinion

Antillon v. New Mexico State Highway Department

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided July 16, 1991No. 12449PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MINZNER, Judge.

Employer appeals and claimant cross-appeals the compensation order of the workers’ compensation administration. We discuss (1) whether certain fringe benefits are included in the definition of “wages” under NMSA 1978, Section 52-1-20(A) (Orig. Pamp.), and (2) whether this claim should be resolved under the provisions of the 1986 Act, NMSA 1978, §§ 52-1-1 to -69 (Orig.Pamp. & Cum.Supp.1986), commonly referred to as the Interim Act, or the 1987 Act, NMSA 1978, §§ 52-1-1 to -70 (Repl. Pamp.1987). We reverse the workers’ compensation judge (WCJ) on those issues. We address…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Matter of Adoption of DoeNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Morrison-Knudsen Construction Co. v. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation ProgramsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Tallman v. ABF (Arkansas Best Freight)New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1988
  4. Reeves v. WimberlyNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1988
  5. Woodson v. Phillips Petroleum Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1985

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Cockle v. Dept. of Labor and IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Edwards v. Board of County CommissionersNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1994
  3. Apodaca v. Payroll Express, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1993
  4. Bowman v. Zenith Radio Corp.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1995
  5. Rendleman v. HeinleyNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2006

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API