Antillon v. New Mexico State Highway Department
New Mexico Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MINZNER, Judge.
Employer appeals and claimant cross-appeals the compensation order of the workers’ compensation administration. We discuss (1) whether certain fringe benefits are included in the definition of “wages” under NMSA 1978, Section 52-1-20(A) (Orig. Pamp.), and (2) whether this claim should be resolved under the provisions of the 1986 Act, NMSA 1978, §§ 52-1-1 to -69 (Orig.Pamp. & Cum.Supp.1986), commonly referred to as the Interim Act, or the 1987 Act, NMSA 1978, §§ 52-1-1 to -70 (Repl. Pamp.1987). We reverse the workers’ compensation judge (WCJ) on those issues. We address…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Matter of Adoption of DoeNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1984
- Morrison-Knudsen Construction Co. v. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation ProgramsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Tallman v. ABF (Arkansas Best Freight)New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1988
- Reeves v. WimberlyNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1988
- Woodson v. Phillips Petroleum Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1985
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Cockle v. Dept. of Labor and IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 2001
- Edwards v. Board of County CommissionersNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1994
- Apodaca v. Payroll Express, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1993
- Bowman v. Zenith Radio Corp.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1995
- Rendleman v. HeinleyNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2006
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.