Legal Opinion

Matlock v. Industrial Commission

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided March 8, 1950No. 5287PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DE CONCINI, Justice.

This is an -appeal by certiorari from an award of the respondent Industrial -Commission of Arizona, hereinafter called the commission. M. A. Matlock, hereinafter called the petitioner, contends that the commission, defendant insurance carrier herein, erred in its final findings and award.

Petitioner suffered an injury arising out of and in the course of his employment with Thomas G. Beaham (Double X Ranch). The accident occurred on August 19, 1946, when a horse fell on petitioner, while he was attempting to rope a calf, resulting in injuries to his right shoulder, right…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hoffman v. BrophyArizona Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Savich v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Kennecott Copper Corp. v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1945
  4. Lee Moor Contracting Co. v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1943
  5. Kay v. Hillside Mines, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1939

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Ball v. MannSupreme Court of Florida · 1954
  2. Ace Steel Baling, Inc. v. PorterfieldOhio Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Allen v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Schnatzmeyer v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1954
  5. Moorehead v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1972

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API