Davis v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
JACOBSON, Presiding Judge.
In this special action review of an Industrial Commission award, the dispositive issue is whether a routine hourly wage increase within a month before an industrial injury justifies using an expanded wage base to compute the average monthly wage. The administrative law judge used an expanded wage base for this reason. Because we conclude this was error, we set aside the award.
The relevant procedural history is as follows. On February 11,1981, the respondent carrier issued a notice of claim status establishing a $637.22 average monthly wage for the petitioner.…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Pettis v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1962
- Brisendine v. Skousen BrothersArizona Supreme Court · 1936
- Powell v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1969
- Kennecott Copper Corp. v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1944
- Floyd Hartshorn Plastering Co. v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1972
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Lowry v. Industrial Com'n of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 1999
- Elco Veterinary Supply v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1983
- Carr v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1999
- Swift Transportation v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1996
- Morse v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2006
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.