Legal Opinion
Archambault v. Water Pollution Control Authority of Waterford
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided April 14, 1987No. 4327PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBieluch, J.
This is an appeal from the trial court’s issuance of an order of mandamus requiring the defendants to make all necessary provisions for the furnishing *441of sewer service to Country Club Drive in Waterford. The defendants claim that the trial court erred (1) in issuing a writ of mandamus based upon § 16-9 of the Waterford Code of Ordinances (code), (2) in finding that the plaintiffs have a clear legal right to the installation of sewers on Country Club Drive, and (3) in holding that the installation of such sewers was not a discretionary function of the defendant Waterford Water Pollution…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Vicksburg v. Vicksburg Waterworks Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1906
- State v. WestSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
- Budkofsky v. Commissioner of Motor VehiclesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
- Clark v. GibbsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
- Szabo v. BeregszazyConnecticut Appellate Court · 1986
3Cited by4 opinions
- Forest Walk, LLC v. Water Pollution Control AuthoritySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
- AvalonBay Communities, Inc. v. Sewer CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
- Wright v. Woodridge Lake Sewer DistrictSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- BRT General Corp. v. Water Pollution Control AuthoritySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003