Legal Opinion
Clark v. Gibbs
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided June 16, 1981PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtArthur H. Healey, J.
The plaintiffs are residents, taxpayers and qualified voters in the city of Norwalk, including its fifth taxing district. The defendants are Elizabeth Y. Gibbs and Mary 0. Keegan who are the city clerk and town clerk, respectively, of the city of Norwalk. On April 7, 1980, the Norwalk board of estimate and taxation approved an operating budget for that city for the 1980-81 fiscal year, and set the mill rate for all seven taxing districts 2 in the city. This action of the board was subject to referendum under article XXIII of the Norwalk charter. 3 On April 17, 1980, the plaintiffs filed with…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- E. J. Hansen Elevator, Inc. v. StollSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1975
- City of Hartford v. American Arbitration Ass'nSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1978
- Stocker v. City of WaterburySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1967
- Howarth v. NorthcottSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1965
- Taylor v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1976
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Normand Josef Enterprises, Inc. v. Connecticut National BankSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- Scinto v. StammSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- Windham Taxpayers Ass'n v. Board of SelectmenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- Williams v. Best Cleaners, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- AvalonBay Communities, Inc. v. Sewer CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.