Legal Opinion

State v. West

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided March 20, 1984No. 12088PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPeters, J.

The question presented by this appeal is whether a photograph, obtained in connection with an arrest which is subsequently nolled, comes within the erasure statute, General Statutes § 54-142a, so that the photograph may not be used for an out-of-court photographic identification of a criminal defendant in an unrelated case. The defendant, James West, was charged by information with the sale of a controlled substance, cocaine, in violation of General Statutes § 19-480 (a).1 The jury returned a verdict of guilty, and the trial court rendered judgment in accordance with the verdict. The…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Vartuli v. SotireSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
  2. Doe v. MansonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
  3. City Council v. HallSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
  4. Engle v. Personnel Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1978
  5. Lechner v. HolmbergSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1973

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Dodd v. Middlesex Mutual Assurance Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
  2. Texaco Refining & Marketing Co. v. Commissioner of Revenue ServicesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
  3. State v. DelossantosSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
  4. State v. MirandaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
  5. Caulkins v. PetrilloSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API